Bullying

We all say rude and stupid things from time to time.  We all have our moments where we say something at the wrong time or treat with others crudely when they most deserve our empathy.  We all slip and we all make mistakes for we are human; it is in our nature.

On the other hand, there are some among us who think this is the only way to live.  The only way to treat with others is to abuse them, be it physically or psychologically.  These people do so with intent, with the express purpose of causing other grief or harm.

Now, which of these would you define as bullies?  Everyone?  Or just that small group of people?

According to the world we live in today, it is the former.

Bullying is no longer aggressive.  It is no longer malicious.  It is no longer persistent and targeted.  It is merely unkindness, particularly toward those things which we like (but not toward those we dislike).  Of course, the object is to tar disagreement with the brush of negativity.  It doesn’t account for complexities or details.  It only serves to denigrate people who disagree with “the right way of thinking.”

The only purpose this serves is to turn people into villains if we don’t like the way they think.

Another word loses all semblance of meaning and, once again, decent people are at the receiving end of the results.

Sincerity and Respect

Note: This is adapted from a Dixon’s Musings post from July 18, 2014.

On Nerd Rage and Twitter, I have spoken (and written) several times before about the necessity of respect.  In fact, I believe that the cause of the vast majority of our internal disagreements on the right stem not from the fact that we disagree, but the fact that we don’t respect each other.  We don’t afford each other respect for our differing beliefs and it harms our discourse.

Today, I want to take that a step further.

I feel that the disrespect we express towards one another has a deeper root.  When we engage in discourse, either with liberals or each other, we don’t give others the benefit of the doubt.  By that, I mean to say that we don’t respect the sincerity of the beliefs of others.

When someone’s point of view doesn’t conform to our own worldview, it’s easy to believe that the other person is not serious.  After all, we “know the truth,” so how can someone honestly believe something contrary to that truth?  How can any serious, honest human being disagree with the truth?  From there, we tend to draw one of two conclusions:

1) Such people are stupid.  Rather than approaching a debate assuming that our partner/opponent has given their point of view some degree of serious thought, we merely assume they are ignorant parrots.  We see them as foolish, which is often the case (such people tend to prove just how wise or ignorant they are over the course of an argument), but not always.  Instead of accepting them as equals (to start), we patronize and demean them.

2) Such people are being intentionally deceptive, either toward themselves or toward others (they’re “trolling”). The person we debate isn’t interested in actually having a civil discourse; only in causing trouble and strife.  To be certain, this happens very frequently in the age of the internet; some people really do like to watch the world burn after they’ve set it aflame.  However, I don’t believe that our automatic response to having our beliefs challenged should be to assume that this mentality is the cause.

Now, there are certainly moments where people need to be roundly mocked and shamed for what they do and what they believe.  As I said before, there are plenty of people who will show their true colors after a few minutes of talk.  However, not every discussion requires mockery simply because someone disagrees with us.  Not every expressed opinion, no matter how wrong or disagreeable, is trite or foolish.  Sometimes, people just think differently from us and legitimately so.

Let’s take a few examples.

Why can’t #NeverTrumpers simply be dissatisfied with the choice presented for November?  Why can’t they have taken an honest and sincere look at Trump and concluded that he is an inadequate candidate for president?  There certainly are many honest and true people among them who simply hold the potential leader of the free world to a high standard and find Trump lacking.

On the other hand, why can’t Trump supporters merely see no other true options?  Why can’t their support for someone who they view as truly different be simply that?  Why must they universally be rubes and racists and fools?  Why can’t Trump supporters truly feel that the prospect of a Clinton presidency is a far more grim fate than anything Trump presents?

Why must every criticism of Islam be viewed as “racist?”  Why is it that people cannot simply see the reality presented before western society by Islamist extremism and react accordingly?  Why must this impulse be born of hate and ignorance?

Conversely, why can’t the defenders of Islam have legitimate concerns about the generalization of a billion people?  Why can’t they have concerns that decent people, caught up the in whirlwind that is the more violent sects of their faith, will suffer undue blowback?  Is there truly no potential for bigotry in response to Islamism?

Why must all those opposed to homosexuality be bigoted and hateful?  Why must laws that protect the rights of businesses to not violate their consciences or maintain the gender segregation of public restrooms be tantamount to Jim Crow segregation?  Why can there not be valid concerns regarding free exercise, free association, and general safety?

Likewise, do LGBT people not have legitimate concerns about their treatment in society?  As a minority, should they not be concerned about and vigilant against marginalization? Are there not many Christians who, rather than approaching the community with love instead approach it with venom and malice?

The list goes on.

To clarify, I do not present those arguments in an attempt to claim that all of them are valid.  I think you, the reader, are perfectly aware that not only do I hold specific points of view on each issue, but I happen to disagree with some of the counter-arguments I offered.  Obviously, contradictory values cannot all be valid; the truth must exist somewhere within them.

The point is that each of these points of view are very strongly and seriously believed by many people.  Simply dismissing the sincerity of these beliefs is often what leads to constant strife.  Rather than understanding that some people, right or wrong, for good or for ill, hold their beliefs strongly and for legitimate reasons, we instead tear them down.  The least we can do for each other is respect this sincerity and treat one another decently when we disagree.

While showing each other respect may not lead to swayed hearts and changed minds, maybe, at the very least, it can soften our discourse.

Some Observations

A lot seems to be going on lately, so I guess I’ll write a little bit about each topic.

– The terror attack in Nice, France has brought out the usual reactions. People blame “religion” and “extremism” for violent, bloody murder, rather than the very specific and prolific religious ideology that is actually responsible. The usual suspects wail that “this isn’t Islam!” and wait with bated breath for the anti-Muslim backlash that never comes. The same people put a filter on their Facebook profile image and start a hashtag, while some jackass drags a piano to the scene and plays a tune.  It’s easy to imagine these selfsame people angrily decry the “thoughts and prayers” of others. Meanwhile, world leaders “condemn” the attacks while doing nothing to address the source of the problem.

Violence and bloodshed in the streets should not and cannot become the norm.  Yet, the people who throw shade favorable to the Islamists do this very thing.  They tell the common people that we can do nothing to counter the very real danger, not without “losing who we are.”  Last I knew, dead men aren’t the same, either.  And should the elite who rule over us continue along this dangerous and bloody path, peace will not be long maintained, neither from the forces without that seek to kill us, nor the forces within who only desire to be safe.

– As someone who does not support the Black Lives Matter movement, I still cannot deny that there is a legitimate need to root out corruption within the criminal justice system, particularly as regards minorities. On the other hand, this very legitimate impulse is overshadowed by the blatant anti-cop viciousness from some portions of BLM.  It doesn’t matter if the majority of the movement doesn’t agree with this notion; far too many of its supporters (carelessly) celebrate the murder of police officers and perpetuate the myth of policemen hunting down blacks in the streets. The men and women charged with keeping our streets safe are being turned into demons to satisfy the victim mentality of people who have never had to suffer under Jim Crow or the struggles of the Civil Rights Movement.

– I think I’ve made it abundantly clear on the show that I believe this entire election cycle to be a mess of colossal proportions. We’re in the heart of the summer and there’s little hope I’ll have a horse in the race come November.  Bear in mind, I’ve not completely discounted the idea of voting for Donald Trump, but as he is now, I cannot support him, and he has not shown any evidence that he will be worth supporting in four months time. It is impossible for me to throw my lot in with a man who has shown none of the qualities I consider vital for a leader.

On the most basic level, I do not trust him when he says he has become a conservative.  A man does not spend his entire life as a liberal, vociferously supporting leftism’s greatest champions, and suddenly have an overnight conversion. Even Christians coming into belief in God and Jesus often take baby steps, slowly subsuming their old worldview with God’s. If something that transformative requires time, then surely changing one’s political ideology, with no concurrent change in one’s character, is even more difficult.

Furthermore, I believe Trump lacks the character to be a good president. He lacks grace, not just in the form of how he carries himself, but how he carries himself towards others.  He’s entirely tactless and undignified in how he presents himself.  His treatment of those opposed to him is no better. Additionally, combining his lack of humility with true power is asking for trouble.

– Part of me genuinely hopes that, given recent events, people at large will wake up to the fact that the world is still a dangerous place.  We, as a society, have managed to live very comfortable lives since the end of the Cold War.  No major international threats, no looming threat of global war or atomic annihilation.  We’ve grown complacent in a world that rewards complacency and apathy with death.

But that dangerous world hasn’t gone away; it only went silent in the face of American power. But as this nation wanes, so to do our enemies wax. And I dread the day that we must see the fruit that our weakness will bear.

The Reason for Memorial Day

Note: This is adapted from a piece previously published on “Dixon’s Musings,” Osei’s largely defunct personal blog.

Though increasingly few remain alive who can recall it, a century has passed since World War I bloodied the fields of Europe.  Indeed, we are currently in the midst of the 100th anniversary of Battle of Verdun, a 10 month long engagement that injured and killed upwards of 1.1 million men.

In our cozy 21st Century lives, we can’t even begin to imagine the magnitude of such slaughter.  We cannot fathom a single battle lasting so long or costing so much.  Nor can we imagine the enormous toll of the war that followed, in which 300 million died, most of them Russian and Chinese civilians.

Indeed, the last major war to occur entirely on American soil, the Civil War, enacted a toll  beyond our comprehension.  The mere idea of suffering and loss (rightfully) turns our stomachs and makes us staunchly opposed to the idea of war.  Many today talk about putting a stop to “endless wars” in the Middle East, and not unjustifiably.

War is a complicated beast.  On the one hand, it is violence incarnate.  Lives are lost.  Communities turned to rubble.  Those who see it and live to tell about it have a part of them broken forever.  War is the great destroyer, the unleashing of our most primal instincts.  Even when combatants try their best, war touches lives both on and off the battlefield, warrior and civilian alike.

Despite all this, war remains a very necessary evil.

How different would the world be if the northern states hadn’t fought their southern brothers?  How would history have panned out if the Union hadn’t committed to victory on the fields of Gettysburg?  Or if they had not persevered through and beyond the bloody slogs of Antietam or Spotsylvania?

What if Germany had dominated all of Europe in the First World War?  What would have happened if the men of France and Britain broke in the face of the Kaiser’s troops?  How would we look upon the past if the United States hadn’t come to break the stalemate?  Some want to believe that World War I was unnecessary, an accident of careless posturing and diplomacy, but I’m not so sure that’s true anymore.

And what of World War II?  Where the preceding conflict was murky, this, the bloodiest and most devastating in all of human history, was not.  In this war, the Nazis of Germany and the imperialists of Japan were poised to seize control of the entire world.  Entire nations were reduced to rubble, crushed under the heels of states for whom power was the only goal.  Soldiers died by the millions repelling this juggernaut; everyone else by the tens of millions.  From the skies of Pearl Harbor and London, to the shores of Iwo Jima and Normandy, down to the streets of Stalingrad and Berlin, men struggled against the most aggressive evil to ever dawn on the planet.

It’s easy to say that we wish no war had ever been fought or should ever be fought again; merely reading of such things is enough to turn the stomach.  But the problem is that there are people in the world who don’t agree.  There are people in the world who crave power and loathe freedom; such people seek to conquer those who would stand in their way.

Such are the reasons we send young men and women off to war.  Not because we wish to see them maimed, to see them suffer, to see them die.  No, the reason they march off to the battlefield is that the price of freedom, the price of all that we have, is blood.

They go to war because they are the few who are willing to make that ultimate sacrifice.  They do what we are unable or unwilling to do ourselves.  For who among us can honestly and truly say we’d lay down our lives for one stranger, let alone millions?

And yet, that is precisely what millions of soldiers have done.  Hundreds, and often thousands of miles from home, soldiers perished to ensure that we can lead the lives we live today.  We can have our barbecues and parties, we can enjoy the comforts of home, blissful and ignorant of the sacrifices it took.

I wish just as much as anyone that there was no need for a Memorial Day at all, that no man had ever been slain in war.  And yet that is not our history.  That is not the world we live in.  That will never be the world we live in, for the greedy and the selfish and the power hungry will not leave us.  There will always be need for the warrior for there will always be a battle that needs to be fought.

To live as we do now demanded and continues to demand sacrifice.  Today we live in the shadow of the millions who gave everything for us.  Do not forget them.  Never forget them.

Don’t Starve Together!

I feel like I opened this tab a week ago intending to write this promotional post, then completely forgot about it.

…Oh, I did.

So, what do you think of the idea of being dropped in the midst of a vast, supernatural wilderness where the darkness kills you and you have to eat constantly survive?  How about where giant spiders nests dot the land and sentient, if primitive, pigmen turn into werepigs on the full moon?  Or how about a game where survival and escape is dependent on SCIENCE?!

If any of that even vaguely appeals to you, then check out my Don’t Starve Together series!   I get together with an old friend and her sister as we try to:

Collect poop!

Not get lost!

Not get shot by walrus men!

Not be crushed by giant cyclopean deer!

Thanks for watching!

The Clone Wars

It’s no secret I’m a total nerd; how do you think I ended up doing this show?  One of the nerd things I do regularly is think about Star Wars.

Sometimes I think about Star Wars too much.  When that happens, it (very rarely) comes out as a video.  One of those rare moments has finally come; I’ve decided to take a look at the Clone Wars.  Not the cartoon series, but as a plot element and an event within the Star Wars universe.

So many aspects of the prequel trilogy went wrong and I think it’s helpful to explore these elements.  Not only does it help us to recognize the problems present in the prequels, it also to deepen one’s understanding of what we’ve ultimately been given and even come to terms with it.  After all, whether we like them or not, we’re stuck with the prequels, flaws and all.

At any rate, enjoy my look at the Clone Wars: